April 2001
A STATE CALL TO ACTION: Working to End Child Abuse and Neglect in Massachusetts
MCC home SECTION V: Preventing the Hurt

CHAPTER 17

Child Abuse Prevention: Within Our Reach

Other state agencies, including the Department of Public Health, the Department of Education, and the quasi-public Children's Trust Fund, are each involved in the development of family supports that serve at-risk populations or the general public. Private sector groups are also providing leadership in developing innovative and effective approaches. Taken together with proposals put forth in the State Call To Action, these can become the foundation upon which a truly statewide, comprehensive, and coordinated system can be built to strengthen our state's families and prevent the abuse and neglect of its children.

 

Other State-Based Prevention and Family Support Efforts

Department of Public Health

The Department of Public Health (DPH), through its Bureau of Family and Community Health, has a number of prevention and family support programs providing services for low income and vulnerable families. The First Link program provides universal screening of newborns and families at high risk of adverse health or developmental outcomes. Referrals to needed services and supports are also provided. DPH's First Steps program provides home visitation to pregnant women and families of newborns and young infants in selected cities and town who have been identified as at higher risk. The Department's Home Visitation Program also provides home visitation for new parents under the age of 20 with a child under the age of 6 months.

The Early Intervention Program identifies children who experience or are at risk of developmental delay due to physical or environmental factors. Through home visits, parent support groups, referral services, and parent training and education, these services work to improve developmental outcomes for children. Currently there are 65 Early Intervention programs across Massachusetts. Other prevention programs that help to reduce child neglect include DPH's Healthy Start Program, which reduces financial barriers to early, comprehensive and continuous prenatal care for low income uninsured women, and the WIC program which provides supplemental nutrition to women, infants and children.

 

Department of Education

The Department of Education (DOE) is committed to improving children's success in school through early intervention efforts directed at families with children from birth through age four. Its Family Network Program operates in 41 sites that cover 162 communities. Through local centers, families can participate in programs to improve parenting skills and reduce isolation, and enroll their children in playgroups and other activities. Referral to other appropriate community supports is also provided.

DOE also funds the Parent-Child Program in Pittsfield where home visitation by para-professionals is made available gratis to at-risk, low-income and low-education level parents of young children. Families can receive up to two years of home visitation per week. The focus here is to model effective parenting. The Pittsfield program, in operation for twenty years, has documented other important benefits for participating families, including a lower student dropout rate and improved student test scores.[262]

 

Massachusetts Children's Trust Fund

The Children's Trust Fund currently funds a number of community agencies and programs serving families. Programs include parenting education and support programs, and initiatives aimed at strengthening the role of fathers. The Trust Fund also funds Family Centers in 6 Massachusetts communities. These sites target parents of children up to age 6, coordinate services, and refer families to appropriate local providers.

Since its inception, a major focus of the Trust Fund's work has been to promote newborn home visitation. Though the effectiveness of home visitation needs to be further documented nationally through larger scale evaluation research, some studies are pointing to improved outcomes for children and mothers involved.

For example, evaluation of home visiting services that conform to the model promoted by Health Families America (HFA) found that families enrolled in home visitation are two to three times less likely to maltreat their children than comparable families who are not enrolled.[263] Prevent Child Abuse America, home of the Healthy Families America program, reports results from several states (Oregon, Florida, Virginia, Arizona and Tennessee) that show improved immunization rates and better links to medical services for children whose parents participate in HFA-type home visiting programs.[264] According to the latest survey conducted in 2000 by Prevent Child Abuse America, over 40,000 families across the country have received these home visitation services.

Evaluation of the Prenatal and Early Childhood Nurse Visitation Programs developed by Dr. David Olds has shown enduring benefits among poor, unmarried women. They averaged fewer subsequent pregnancies, a longer time between the births of their first and second children, fewer months on welfare, fewer behavioral problems related to substance abuse, and fewer arrests.

With support from Healthy Families Massachusetts - an ad hoc committee of state agencies and private groups promoting newborn home visiting - the Children's Trust Fund has taken the lead in successfully advocating for voluntary home visitation for all new parents age 20 and under in Massachusetts. Strong support from legislative leaders has resulted in an increase from $5 million dollars to $16.1 million dollars for newborn home visiting within a five-year period.

Healthy Families Newborn Home Visiting in Massachusetts is funded through the Children's Trust Fund and administered in partnership with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. It includes 30 lead agencies statewide that offer home visitation programs, with additional subcontracted sites bringing the total to 60 program sites. Since its inception over 400 home visitors, sometimes referred to as "family advocates," have provided services to approximately 6,500 families. Caseloads are set at 15, although this can vary depending on the types of family issues involved.

Parents 20 years and under can participate in the program if they are first time parents, with a child under one year of age at the time of enrollment. Services can continue until the child reaches the age of three. Participation is voluntary in this primary prevention model.

Ninety hours of basic training through an established core curriculum is required of all home visitors. It is offered statewide on a regular basis along with other standardized trainings. Currently, an independent evaluation involving Healthy Families participants is being conducted by Tufts University. Final evaluation results are still pending.

 

Prevention and Family Support in the Private Sector

Since the late 80s, child and family advocates in Massachusetts have been working to promote a shift away from crisis-driven interventions toward a proactive promotion of child and family well-being. The Special Committee on Family Support, an ad-hoc group of these advocates, has articulated in its seminal report, From Crisis to Opportunity, a vision in which families and their communities play the central role in organizing programs and allocating resources that genuinely support families.

In its surveys and papers, the Committee has identified strength-based programs across the state that provide powerful supports to families despite their generally low and unstable budgets. Among the supports provided by these programs are: flexible, drop-in childcare; parent social activities; playgroups; teen centers; health care and education; substance abuse prevention; domestic violence awareness and services; and advocacy.

More and more researchers are improving their methods of evaluating the impact of prevention and family support programs on parents and children. Although refining our knowledge about effective strategies should be ongoing, there are several prevention and family support programs that have a solid history of successfully helping parents and children. Many are effective from both a clinical and fiscal perspective.[266] A description of selected programs follows:

Parents Helping Parents

Effective family support programs include self-help/mutual-aide groups, such as Parents Helping Parents (PHP) where parents under stress are served anonymously and supportively. This unique resource assists parents who are isolated, overwhelmed, or afraid of their anger towards their children. Groups are led by a trained facilitator (unpaid), in partnership with a parent leader from the group. Churches and local agencies donate meeting space. Over 50 groups are currently meeting in communities across the state each week, including four prison groups that serve incarcerated parents.

The concerns parents bring to their PHP group are varied, as is the severity of their needs. For some parents, PHP serves as a prevention resource to help them when they feel isolated, frustrated, and lack trusted friends to talk to about parenting concerns. For others, PHP can be a lifeline when serious parenting problems exist, for example, when abuse or neglect has occurred or children have been removed from their home. Approximately half of the organization's members have been involved with the Department of Social Services.

Groups that have a "mixed membership," in terms of severity of parenting issues, usually work very well. Parents with less severe problems discover that their concerns are less traumatic that they once thought. They are then able to gain perspective and discover that their experiences can be helpful to others. Parents with more severe problems are relieved to be welcomed with respect by others in the groups. They come to realize that despite the negative parenting behaviors, e.g. yelling, hitting, that brought them to the group, they can learn new skills and a deeper understanding of their own unmet needs. Through the compassion of others, they come to see themselves as worthwhile people in their own right and, eventually, as a support to others. This dynamic allows some of the neediest parents to gain hope and appreciation for the strengths they never knew they had.

Evaluations of this self-help approach have confirmed several benefits, including: [267]

  • statistically significant and immediate decrease in frequency of physical abuse after joining the group;
  • decrease in frequency of verbal abuse, improving with length of stay in the program;
  • greater parental self-esteem;
  • less social isolation;
  • increased ability to handle stress; and,
  • better understanding of children and their needs.

This approach is cost effective as well. PHP weekly support groups cost approximately $600 per family per year. Costs associated with recruiting and training of volunteer group facilitators, staffing the PHP support phone line, and promoting the service statewide are met through private funds and a small state grant from DSS.

 

Parent Aides

One of the seminal evaluations of child abuse services, the 1974 Berkeley Planning Study, found results that are still relevant today.[268] It dealt with the effectiveness of the lay visitor or parent aide model. Parent aides are trained, professionally supervised individuals, volunteer or paid, who assist parents under stress or those at risk of abuse or neglect. The one-on-one relationship is parent-focused, non-judgmental, non-authoritarian and nurturing. Parent aides work in the home to develop parental self-confidence and esteem; home management, problem solving, communication and coping skills; and the use of appropriate community resources.

The study found important results among parents who were in traditional treatment or counseling for at least six months, and who received parent aide services in PHP type self-help groups. These parents were most likely to show improved functioning by the end of treatment and had the best chances of reducing the likelihood of future abuse.

Benefits for parents included:

  • more positive attitudes towards their children;
  • increased awareness of child development;
  • improved ability to talk about problems and handle crises;
  • more constructive ways of channeling anger;
  • an increased sense of independence;
  • improved self-esteem.

The study also pointed out that those services that proved more effective also tended to be those that were the least expensive.

Here in Massachusetts, parent aide services essentially provide home visitation services, but to a population of families who have already been reported for abuse or neglect and who are under the care of DSS.

These private services funded by DSS have just completed their first year under the Lead Agency Initiative described earlier in this report. While the newborn home visitation services provided under Healthy Families operate under a flexible strength-based model, the DSS-funded Parent Aide programs struggle under the fiscal constraints of the managed care model. A discrepancy exists between the philosophy of strength-based, family-centered assessment and services espoused by DSS Central Office and the traditional deficit-based model that has been practiced historically within local DSS offices, and social services in general.

The fiscal charge given to the Lead Agencies sometimes undermines implementation of the Parent Aide model, which is fundamentally grounded in the development of a relationship between the Parent Aide and parent. The relationship and trust building that are so essential to the success of this parent support cannot be accomplished within rigid, limited timelines. Outcome measures that are limited to a short time (3 months of service) are simply unrealistic and inappropriate for many families who could make significant gains given the chance to work within an uncompromised Parent Aide model.

Many Parent Aide programs report that, despite waiting lists, they are now providing lower levels of service than they had been historically. This threatens the ability of programs to retain experienced, trained staff, maintain program quality, and, in some cases, even keep their doors open. The Association of Massachusetts Parent Aide Programs, a longstanding voluntary organization of Parent Aide programs, continues to advocate for the integrity of its model even within the managed care system. If managed care is concerned with meaningful client outcomes and reducing costs in the long term, it cannot afford to reduce Parent Aide services in the short term.

 

Family Nurturing Program

The Family Nurturing Center of Massachusetts helps build nurturing communities where children are cherished, families are supported, and private and public policies promote healthy human development. It develops and pilots innovative family support and educational programs, then mentors others who adapt them for use within their own organizations and communities. By working in partnership with others, the FNC changes attitudes and practices of both families and the professionals who deliver services to them. Using this approach, the Center has successfully spread nurturing values and creative new family support programs across Massachusetts.

One of the cornerstones for the work of the Family Nurturing Center is the Family Nurturing Program. The Family Nurturing Programs are validated, internationally recognized programs that promote nurturing relationships among all family members while building community connections to support positive parenting attitudes and behaviors. Developed over twenty years ago by the National Institute of Mental Health and child abuse researchers Bavolek and Comstock, the Nurturing Programs are now operating in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America, and Israel.

Nurturing Programs are weekly classes that families, adults and children take together. Programs are held in convenient, safe and nurturing environments and involve adults and children in interactive, fun, age-appropriate activities that promote nurturing attitudes and behaviors. Programs range in duration from 9-23 sessions and address the following topics: communication skills, identifying and expressing feelings, nurturing discipline techniques, use of personal power, managing conflict and confrontation, promoting positive self-esteem, empathy, alternatives to physical punishment, and information about age-appropriate expectations for children.

Nurturing Programs are targeted to: prenatal families, teen parents, parents of school age children, parents with infants and toddlers, families struggling with substance abuse treatment and recovery, foster and birth families, Spanish speaking families, Cape Verdean Creole-speaking families, and more recently, the Father's Nurturing Program.

Extensive evaluation has shown the program to be effective in changing both negative parenting attitudes and behaviors.[269] Families that participate demonstrate:

  • significant increase in family cohesion, communications and organization,
  • marked decrease in family conflict,
  • significant decrease in reliance on abusive discipline techniques.

The success of this approach can be seen further in the high numbers of families who begin and complete the programs and who report high rates of satisfaction. The programs are free for the families and most often include a meal and transportation. Program costs are underwritten through private and state grants.

The Family Nurturing Program was initially piloted in Massachusetts in 1990 as part of a five-year, federally funded demonstration project called Dorchester CARES, of which MCC was a founding partner. Today, the Family Nurturing Center works with organizations statewide to provide direct nurturing programs to families, and extensive training and consultation to communities interested in developing Nurturing Programs in their area.

As more and more families and community groups experience the success of Nurturing Programs, the demand for more programs increases. Currently, there are waiting lists for many community programs and in many places there is limited access to programs. Clearly, this proven effective family support program needs to be expanded where it currently exists and developed in other communities statewide.

 

Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention

In 1996, six months before the highly publicized death of 17-month-old Matthew Eappen in Massachusetts, MCC launched its statewide "Never Shake a Baby" Campaign to reduce infant death and disability due to Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS). Through television, radio and the print media, parents and caretakers have been offered information about the devastating results that can occur from this type of assault on an infant or young child. Coping with infant crying and fussiness, often the triggers of SBS, has been an important feature of the Campaign's message.

Now operating under MCC's "Prevent Child Abuse Massachusetts" (PCA) program, the campaign has reached thousands of parents directly through brochures and printed materials, requests on PCA's 800-CHILDREN line, and through campaign information distributed by hospitals, clinics, birthing classes, schools, libraries, etc. Over 500,000 teaching brochures have been distributed throughout Massachusetts and in several other states (Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Delaware, etc.) that have adopted the brochure as their core teaching tool.

As it moves to the next phase of its campaign, PCA Massachusetts is seeking to replicate a successful, eight-county SBS prevention pilot effort in Western New York State. Coordinated through Children's Hospital of Buffalo, the effort targeted new parents within hospitals with a combination of written SBS information, video presentation, and signed parental statement acknowledging understanding of the information.[270] The counties have documented a 75 percent decrease in reported SBS cases. Prior to the effort, one case was identified every seven weeks; the number has now dropped to one case every eight months.

Brockton and Haverhill are two communities that have taken the lead locally to reduce SBS injuries and death. The former effort was launched by the District Attorney's Office in collaboration with local hospitals, agencies and schools; the latter by the mother of an SBS victim who works in her community to educate medical professionals, school children and the general public.

Massachusetts does not currently have a formal curriculum in place to teach middle school and older children about SBS prevention. However, such tools have been developed using demonstrations, video, and discussion materials to help young teens learn about SBS as they begin to take independent care of their siblings and other children. This type of curriculum is seen as an effective way to reach future mothers and fathers.

 

Child Sexual Abuse Prevention and Treatment

Currently, Massachusetts lacks a comprehensive, statewide strategy to reduce sexual assaults against children and to address the critical lack of effective evaluation and treatment resources for both child victims and for child, youth, and adult offenders.

Successful prevention and treatment strategies in other states should be accessed and replicated. For example, a coordinated effort in Vermont resulted in a reduction of proven cases by 51 percent between 1990-1998. Partnerships among the State child protective agency, law enforcement, the Attorney General's office, child advocacy groups, public health agencies, and the media were cited as instrumental in this dramatic reduction of child sexual abuse. Through a recently launched, large-scale public education campaign conducted in partnership with non-profit organizations, Vermont seeks to identify even more cases of unreported child sexual abuse.[271]

Although many Massachusetts schools do provide prevention education curricula around "stranger danger" issues and "good touch/bad touch," it is not clear just how effective these programs are in actually protecting children when they are in threatening situations. Although they do increase awareness, it has been shown that these programs are more effective for older children - younger children require more frequent exposure to program materials. Though some children exposed to these programs may have benefited from increased awareness about sexual abuse, it is not evident that children who actually experienced threats and assaults were able to limit their seriousness.[272] Though prevention curricula should be part of a comprehensive strategy, they cannot be the center of it. Other complementary strategies will need to be considered as part of an effective statewide prevention effort.

In developing a comprehensive plan to address child sexual abuse, Massachusetts should seriously explore models that can address the population of offenders who wish to stop their offending and need support to do it. Some states have initiated broad public awareness campaigns aimed directly at sexual abusers. Through a special hotline established in Vermont, for example, sexual abuse perpetrators were guided to seek treatment and to accept responsibility for their actions. Outcome data from the Vermont effort should be carefully reviewed.

Massachusetts should also explore ways to involve the media as partners in educating the public about the impact of child sexual abuse. Such partnerships could help educate citizens about how to talk to their children about sexual abuse; signs to be aware of in both child victims and adult perpetrators; how to address factors that make disclosure among children difficult. These can be complex dynamics, but with clear and consistent public education messages, many families and communities can be strengthened in their vigilance against this devastating threat.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Fund universal, voluntary newborn home visiting for all new parents.
    Massachusetts can be proud of its success in making available newborn home visitation support to all parents 20 and under that seek it. The state must now move to benchmark when and how it will phase in universal home visitation for all new parents, irrespective of parental age.


  2. Expand funding for proven effective family support programs so they are accessible to all Massachusetts parents who seek them.
    Family supports that have documented their effectiveness in preventing child abuse and neglect and in reducing the stresses associated with child maltreatment must be expanded where they currently exist and their availability extended statewide.


  3. Expand Shaken Baby Syndrome prevention efforts.
    Massachusetts should replicate efforts that have succeeded in reducing infant death and disability due to Shaken Baby Syndrome. Initiatives aimed at educating new parents within birthing hospitals, and special outreach to young men - the most frequent perpetrators of SBS - should be implemented. All state agencies involved with parents and children should incorporate SBS prevention education into their training and direct service programs.


  4. Establish a statewide Sexual Abuse Prevention and Treatment Strategy.
    Massachusetts must develop a comprehensive, coordinated, statewide strategy to effectively reduce sexual assaults against children and to address the critical lack of effective evaluation and treatment resources for both child victims and for child, youth, and adult offenders. Public education efforts involving the media should be an integral part of the strategy. Such coordinated efforts, in Vermont, for example, have reduced proven cases by 51 percent over a decade. Massachusetts should set a similar goal and work to achieve it.

 

Return to Top

 

Section V: Preventing the Hurt:

  • Section V home

  • Chapter 16: Family Support: The Critical Paradigm Shift

    • The Family Support Philosophy
    • Traditional Services and Family Support
    • Parental Involvement in Family Support
    • DSS Family Support Programs
    • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Chapter 17: Child Abuse Prevention: Within Our Reach
    • Other State-Based Prevention and Family Support Efforts
    • Prevention and Family Support in the Private Sector
    • Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention
    • Child Sexual Abuse Prevention
    • RECOMMENDATIONS

     


Massachusetts Citizens for Children
14 Beacon Street, Suite 706 ~ Boston, MA 02108
phone: 617-742-8555 ~ fax: 617-742-7808 ~ www.masskids.org